this post was submitted on 21 Nov 2023
1288 points (93.6% liked)

A Boring Dystopia

10490 readers
104 users here now

Pictures, Videos, Articles showing just how boring it is to live in a dystopic society, or with signs of a dystopic society.

Rules (Subject to Change)

--Be a Decent Human Being

--Posting news articles: include the source name and exact title from article in your post title

--If a picture is just a screenshot of an article, link the article

--If a video's content isn't clear from title, write a short summary so people know what it's about.

--Posts must have something to do with the topic

--Zero tolerance for Racism/Sexism/Ableism/etc.

--No NSFW content

--Abide by the rules of lemmy.world

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If he shaft you for a 100$ on your paycheck or he takes it from from your pocket, it's still the same thing. You are a 100$ short by malicious intent.

[–] deweydecibel 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Right but, as far as the law is concerned, shorting you $100 is not the same as stealing it from you, because you did not possess it until it was given to you. But that does not mean it isn't a crime, it's just considered a different type of crime.

Stealing from a tin is theft of money in someone else's possession to which you have no right to.

You are owed your wages. It would be a crime not to pay what you are owed, to fullfil their binding legal obligation. We call it theft (because it is) but the distinction is that it's a failure to deliver something in their possession to you.

And the reason the punishment isn't the same is because if we start jailing people for failure to pay money they owe someone else, it is going to hurt the poor faaaar worse than the wealthy or the business owners.

It's just not a good analogy. The point it's trying to make is fine but the example is poor.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Oh in that case I'll just pocket the $100 a customer gives me for groceries, instead of putting it in the drawer to which it is owed.

Since we want a consistent rule, the store should be repossessed just like a car, or at least missed wages should have massive late fees.