this post was submitted on 26 Jun 2023
21 points (100.0% liked)

Daystrom Institute

675 readers
4 users here now

Welcome to Daystrom Institute!

Serious, in-depth discussion about Star Trek from both in-universe and real world perspectives.

Read more about how to comment at Daystrom.

Rules

1. Explain your reasoning

All threads and comments submitted to the Daystrom Institute must contain an explanation of the reasoning put forth.

2. No whinging, jokes, memes, and other shallow content.

This entire community has a “serious tag” on it. Shitposts are encouraged in Risa.

3. Be diplomatic.

Participate in a courteous, objective, and open-minded fashion. Be nice to other posters and the people who make Star Trek. Disagree respectfully and don’t gatekeep.

4. Assume good faith.

Assume good faith. Give other posters the benefit of the doubt, but report them if you genuinely believe they are trolling. Don’t whine about “politics.”

5. Tag spoilers.

Historically Daystrom has not had a spoiler policy, so you may encounter untagged spoilers here. Ultimately, avoiding online discussion until you are caught up is the only certain way to avoid spoilers.

6. Stay on-topic.

Threads must discuss Star Trek. Comments must discuss the topic raised in the original post.

Episode Guides

The /r/DaystromInstitute wiki held a number of popular Star Trek watch guides. We have rehosted them here:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

We often see technology from the future brought back to the present, whether as a case of a chance encounter, or something more.

However, it’s also fairly uncommon to see those technologies pop up against after they’ve been introduced. One such example is the ablative armour generators that Admiral Janeway fitted to the Voyager, being prototypes from a future Starfleet, which are seen in that episode, and then never again, even in shows that are set after the time she left.

The reason for this might be that the Federation does not want to run the risk of being accused of violating the temporal prime directive (or accidentally running afoul of it in some other way), and shelves that particular technology entirely.

From their standpoint, it would be rather difficult to separate a technology that the Federation developed of their own accord, compared to one that they might have developed from being inspired by, or reverse-engineering a piece of future technology, so they shelve it, rather than risk the trouble, never developing the preliminary steps to reach that future technology.

The only anachronistic part of this is the Doctor’s mobile emitter, which is a variant of 26th century technology, and was developed into Picard, but that can be explained by it being reverse engineered from 26th century technology, by someone in the 20th century, technically making it technology from the past. Since it is Earth technology from their own past, they might be able to get away with iterating on their own version without risking trouble with the various temporal enforcement agencies.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

That seems unlikely. If starfleet warehouses the future tech (which, itself, seems like a likely scenario for the reasons outlined here), then near future research would not have access to it, or reverb know about it. Therefore there is no reason that the development of the precursor technologies should be prevented or prohibited.

Don't forget that precursor technology often looks nothing like what eventually comes from it - it is often not even in the same ballpark. No-stick cookware was developed from space shuttle heat shielding...

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Radar was initially designed for aircraft detection. Not long after saw the "Radar Range" enter the market. This familiar technology is called the Microwave.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

And all because some poor schmuck at an early radio lab had a candy bar in their pocket that got melted.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

South Park has ruined so many things for me. The Radar story makes me think of Randy Marsh; "Just gonna get a little cancer Stan... Don't tell your mom."

[–] T156 1 points 1 year ago

Therefore there is no reason that the development of the precursor technologies should be prevented or prohibited.

The reasoning that I had going is that Starfleet would not be able to sufficiently prove that their decision to develop their technology is not in violation of the Temporal Prime Directive, since it could be inspired by their scans/records of it, similar to the alien species from the first episode of Strange New Worlds.

In order to reduce the trouble that they might get into with temporal enforcement (which is further complicated by their awareness of there being a temporal prime directive, and possibly becoming party to it as a result), they depriotise/halt that research, since it causes a bunch of extra headaches that they might not otherwise wish to deal with, not when there are other research projects and burgeoning technologies that could be of similar interest.