this post was submitted on 19 Nov 2023
704 points (90.6% liked)

linuxmemes

21390 readers
1310 users here now

Hint: :q!


Sister communities:


Community rules (click to expand)

1. Follow the site-wide rules

2. Be civil
  • Understand the difference between a joke and an insult.
  • Do not harrass or attack members of the community for any reason.
  • Leave remarks of "peasantry" to the PCMR community. If you dislike an OS/service/application, attack the thing you dislike, not the individuals who use it. Some people may not have a choice.
  • Bigotry will not be tolerated.
  • These rules are somewhat loosened when the subject is a public figure. Still, do not attack their person or incite harrassment.
  • 3. Post Linux-related content
  • Including Unix and BSD.
  • Non-Linux content is acceptable as long as it makes a reference to Linux. For example, the poorly made mockery of sudo in Windows.
  • No porn. Even if you watch it on a Linux machine.
  • 4. No recent reposts
  • Everybody uses Arch btw, can't quit Vim, and wants to interject for a moment. You can stop now.
  • ย 

    Please report posts and comments that break these rules!


    Important: never execute code or follow advice that you don't understand or can't verify, especially here. The word of the day is credibility. This is a meme community -- even the most helpful comments might just be shitposts that can damage your system. Be aware, be smart, don't fork-bomb your computer.

    founded 1 year ago
    MODERATORS
     
    you are viewing a single comment's thread
    view the rest of the comments
    [โ€“] [email protected] 34 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

    True story, Linux sees MIME types, so if Hot.Chick.Blows.Brother.mp4 is a virus, it shows up with a Windows (MZ) binary icon, not a media icon ๐Ÿ˜‰... unlike Windows which only recognizes extensions ๐Ÿ˜’.

    [โ€“] superduperenigma 48 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

    Microsoft, in their infinite wisdom, also decided that file extensions should be hidden by default. So you won't even see that you downloaded TaylorSwift_1989_TaylorsVersion.exe instead of TaylorSwift_1989_TaylorsVersion.mp3 unless you changed that setting ahead of time.

    [โ€“] [email protected] 23 points 1 year ago

    Or worse, Numb_LinkinPark.mp3.exe just shows up as Numb_LinkinPark.mp3, making it look like it's DEFINITELY a legit MP3!

    [โ€“] Sidhean 19 points 1 year ago (1 children)

    Wait.. Real?? I guess its always been a part of the first round of changes I've always made to Windows. Crazy how much I've normalized fighting the software I use.

    Anyway, that's wild. What a just bad and unsafe decision.

    [โ€“] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago

    See, this is mostly because of 2 things. One, when changing filenames, users make the stupid mistake of changing the extension as well (having no extension that is), which of course, in Windows, it means the file won't be recognized as a media file. Two, blind you from the truth - you don't want users that can think, that's not what our bysiness is about ๐Ÿ˜. Also the reason behind why Windows has less and less options and people that want to change something have to revert to registery hacks to do so.

    [โ€“] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago

    It's even worse, since exe files can have custom icons, the malware will have a mp3 player icon in their exe file, making it totes confusing.

    [โ€“] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

    And this only gets worse, since audio file tags (and I believe video files as well ๐Ÿค”) include album art nowadays, so it has an icon that is the album art... exe's also have custom icons, so ๐Ÿคท...

    [โ€“] RidcullyTheBrown 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

    That's not a Linux thing. It's just whatever desktop shell you chose to use and various shells behave in various ways. The reason this might be safer in most Linux distros is that you're discouraged from executing things under a privileged user which means that malware can't make significant changest to your system easily. If you do the same in windows, you'd be just as safe.

    [โ€“] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

    Not exactly... I mean, yes, you're right about the privileges thing, but Windows has a lot more security holes than Linux (or any POSIX based OS for that matter). The root of the problem, as always is the distant Windows relative, DOS... no user space notion whatsoever... and Windows NT has dragged these issues for decades now, all because MS made (bought) DOS and distributed it.

    [โ€“] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

    My memory is fuzzy and I don't know the correct words to research it, but I am pretty sure that depends on the DE.
    Either KDE Plasma (dolphin) or GNOME (nautilus) uses the extension iirc. Maybe that changed though.

    [โ€“] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

    Have no idea, haven't changed a DE in over 6 or 7 years, I use xfce.