this post was submitted on 18 Nov 2023
228 points (97.5% liked)

World News

39155 readers
4315 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

A team of scientists broke new ground when a plane capable of carrying more than 300 passengers landed in Antarctica, with aviators hailing it as a world first.

The plane, a Boeing 787 Dreamliner, successfully slipped down in Troll airfield on Wednesday night, while basking in Antarctica's all-day summer sunlight.

Carrying a 45-strong team made up of researchers and staff from the Norwegian Polar Institute, the organisation said they managed to bring 12 tonnes of research equipment.

...

"The most important thing is the environmental benefits we can achieve by using large and modern aircraft of this type for Troll," Ms Brekke said.

"This can help to reduce total emissions and the environmental footprint in Antarctica."

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] sizzler 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

You've never heard of the term lip-service have you? How about green-washing? If you honestly think there is anything environmentally-friendly about man's occupation of Antartica then I honestly don't know what to say.

[–] Deme 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

So all the environmental science done there is somehow not good for the environment?

While there's definitely already too much tourists, about 90% of people visiting inland Antarctica are still scientists and their support staff.

[–] sizzler -3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Honestly, I'd put most of that could be done autonomously and remotely now. Both poles are of such sensitivity that pollution there is much worse.

[–] Deme 2 points 1 year ago

Mars rovers are expensive as fuck, their capabilities are basic at most when compared to humans, and even then they aren't built to withstand snow and ice. Research institutes don't send people to the ass end of the world just because they can.

Remote sensing is great, but a considerable portion of the work done in the Antarctic is to benchmark the data we get from Earth observation satellites so we can develop those capabilities further. And even then, there's only so much that can be done with satellites.