this post was submitted on 18 Nov 2023
554 points (96.9% liked)

World News

38290 readers
3853 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 12 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Well, you are right. And I agree. Although in my defence, he made the initial claim without further evidence.

Anywho, the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), an agency operating under the UN, has done plenty of research and published papers about this.

The conundrum lies in that while we need more effective food production, we also want everything to be grown naturally (without fertilizer and/or free range livestock etc.), which is ineffective.

We need more land for crops and animals to feed more people, but we also need more space to house those same people, meanwhile we cannot continue deforestation.

On top of those, soil needs time to replenish all the nutrients. If it's not given that opportunity, it WILL become permanently unusable.

There's simply too many conflicting wants and needs that are strictly incompatible.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

So are you suggesting that there would be enough resources to go around if we didn't want organic food and huge single-family houses for homes?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

That's not at all what they said.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I didn't say they said that. I asked if they were suggesting it.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago

If you read back through their comments I think you'll have your answer.