this post was submitted on 17 Nov 2023
136 points (92.0% liked)

World News

39141 readers
2925 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

or people would also spend more time protesting Hamas.

So there are three problems with this:

1-Hamas is a response to Israeli occupation, not an independent phenomenon. You can't stop them without taking out the root cause.

2-What, exactly, would protesting Hamas even accomplish? Protesting Israel is basically telling your government to put pressure on Israel to stop its genocide of Gaza. You can't put pressure on Hamas since they're already cut off from almost the whole world.

3-The assumption that the existence or non-existence of Hamas has any effect on Israeli treatment of Palestinians is very naive.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

The assumption that the existence or non-existence of Hamas has any effect on Israeli treatment of Palestinians is very naive.

The blockade didn't happen until Hamas was elected, the treatment of Gaza was obviously different before Hamas launched this attack. It is plainly obvious that Hamas had an effect on Israeli treatment of Palestinians, especially ones under their government.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It was an occupation before it became a blockade just in case you weren’t aware.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Right. Israel unilaterally left and disbanded all settlements in Gaza, then Gaza elected Hamas, then blockade.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

No you’re mixing it up. It transitioned immediately from occupation to siege and that’s part of what let Hamas get a plurality (not a majority) of the vote.

Not to mention they set up settlements in the West Bank to this day.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago

Uh... No. After the disengagement they immediately (three months before the voting) blockaded Gaza.