this post was submitted on 16 Nov 2023
66 points (93.4% liked)

Folderol

102 readers
1 users here now


From Cambridge Dictionary:

unnecessary actions or words that have little meaning and make something seem more important or complicated than it really is


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

I do wonder how were they going to enforce it in the first place.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] breadsmasher 13 points 1 year ago (2 children)

enforce it

aren’t teslas always connected to HQ, and they could easily be disabled?

Just like with the self driving thing, and when resold it was disabled for the new buyer even though the original purchaser paid for it

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I guess I was going more for the legal reasoning rather than technical. Yes, technically disabling a computer is trivial. I just can't see how a company can do that when it's legal property of somebody else. That's just a lawsuit waiting to happen.

[–] breadsmasher 7 points 1 year ago

why would laws and regulations stop muski ?

[–] McNomin 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Just a guess, but perhaps it's treated as a software license?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It might be tesla's wishlist, but no way you can brick a car and use that as an excuse.

[–] McNomin 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The car still functions so not fully bricked, but I see the argument that the purchased self driving function is bricked. Wouldn't be surprised if there's language in the agreement that deems it as a service. Just another shitty business practice to increase bottom line.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Holy shit, they did this? How has there never been a lawsuit that made headlines? IMO, that’s theft.