this post was submitted on 16 Nov 2023
-48 points (23.3% liked)

Technology

59708 readers
5450 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

most people hate ai, but the bots on lemmy are an acception since they bring life to the communities when activities dries up. I mean- am I wrong here?thoughts? opinions?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] rob299 2 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I feel people are just misunderstanding, I don't see why there's so much backlash, let me explain my thoughts process in more detail.

my idea was actually more like this.

sometimes a bot might post an article, sometimes a real person. if the article is relavent, then real people might join in to discuss the article, which on this community this happens.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

For what it's worth, even though I don't agree with you, I think this is an interesting post and discussion, so I've upvoted it. Thank you.

[–] rob299 1 points 1 year ago

I am totally ok with disagreements. I think people like to learn from others, even when they might just simply be wrong at times in the public opinion.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

You're saying a bot can pose a discussion prompt (taken from some rss feed or whatever), a totally reasonable (if perhaps not ideal) observation.

A lot of the people in this thread seem to be assuming you're talking about GPT or whatever making up threads whole-cloth.

You did say "ai" though, so this is kinda on you.

[–] rob299 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I did say ai. I said

"ai, but the bots." People in this thread were actually legitly saying their stance on bots. and also on ai. which, if I'm wrong then i'm wrong, I accept the critisism. personally this post could be a meme at this point. 27 downvotes, that's crazy on Lemmy. I hadn't seen a post on this communitywith as many, not sure if that's a record or not. for this community.

edit: now 26 and if any changes further, then that's where the number is .

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

The backlash is because people do not want bots to overrun and kill our communities because we recognise that is exactly what they do. Even if a bot were to post something interesting it is reducing the opportunity for a human to post the same thing. This reduces engagement in the long run. Communities are extremely dependant on posters, not just commenters. You could have a bot post an interesting article that stirs a lot of discussion, but in the long run fewer people will be coming back as there is no incentive to put any work in.

Look what's happened to Facebook for example. Most of the feed got overrun by generated content instead of user posts. Now who seriously engages with Facebook other than just endlessly scrolling and your odd person who overshares every intimate detail.