this post was submitted on 09 Nov 2023
16 points (100.0% liked)

New York Times gift articles

584 readers
41 users here now

Share your New York Times gift articles links here.

Rules:

Info:

Tip:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://slrpnk.net/post/3853502

To be clear: carbon capture like this is a tiny and expensive part of what needs doing over the next few years

It's getting a lot of support and publicity in large part because it's backed by the oil industry, which is trying to create social permission for continued extraction and burning on a much larger scale than the removal.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

If renewable energy is used to power the kiln that regenerates the calcium carbonate back into calcium oxide powder (e.g. solar), then most of the carbon dioxide emitted by the process will be from the initial manufacture of the equipment. This may be small, especially given the simplicity of the design.