this post was submitted on 10 Nov 2023
25 points (77.8% liked)

World News

40590 readers
3556 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

AlJazeera.com

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] fubo 16 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

To be clear, the news organizations haven't rejected the claim that the freelance photographers they worked with were complicit in the attacks. They've just rejected the claim that they (the news organizations) were complicit, and have cut ties with the photographers who are alleged to be complicit.

Some of the freelance photographers appear to have accompanied Hamas members on attacks on civilians, in a way that implies that they knew the attack was going to happen and were able to prepare to cover it.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The New York Times, which works with Yousef Masoud, another of the four photojournalists, called the accusations that its newsroom had advance knowledge of the attacks “untrue and outrageous”.

“We also want to speak in defense of freelance photojournalists working in conflict areas, whose jobs often require them to rush into danger to provide first-hand witness accounts and to document important news. This is the essential role of a free press in wartime,” a statement by the newspaper said.

Well NYT of all people defending the journalist, the rest denied their knowledge of the attack, Reuter and CNN cut ties. The allegation is made by Dishonest Reporting is simply untrue.

[–] fubo 4 points 1 year ago

Read closely. They're saying the newsroom didn't have advance knowledge of the attacks; not that the independent photographer didn't.