Technology

59092 readers

4909 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

661

Mozillas petition to get an answer from Microsoft, is it using your data to train its AI? (foundation.mozilla.org)

submitted 1 year ago by LunchEnjoyer to c/technology

72 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Microsofts new Terms and Service agreement is rather questionable. In short; It does not clarify if Microsoft will use your data to train it's AI.

So Mozilla is calling for arms to sign their petition for Microsoft to give a proper answer! You can sign it here -> https://foundation.mozilla.org/en/campaigns/microsoft-ai/

Mozillas Context;

Ask Microsoft: Are you using our personal data to train AI? We had four lawyers, three privacy experts, and two campaigners look at Microsoft's new Service Agreement, and none of our experts could tell if Microsoft plans on using your personal data – including audio, video, chat, and attachments from 130 products, including Office, Skype, Teams, and Xbox – to train its AI models.

If nine experts in privacy can't understand what Microsoft does with your data, what chance does the average person have? That's why we're asking Microsoft to say if they're going to use our personal data to train its AI.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Why ask when you know the answer is yes?

If the product is free, you are the product. Even when it's not free, you're still the product because data is too valuable.

[–] LunchEnjoyer 31 points 1 year ago (1 children)

although a good mentality, its not always correct. Also, this isn't just about "asking", it's fighting big corps/tech to be more transparent about their policies.

[+] [email protected] -9 points 1 year ago (3 children)

And if they say "yes", if they are blatant and transparent about their business model, that will somehow make it better? This idea of "putting sunshine on a problem" never actually solves anything. The problem company just comes back with "Yeah? So? What the fuck are you going to do about it?"

[–] LunchEnjoyer 9 points 1 year ago

Well, the more negative feedback they get the more they will rethink it. Just like what happened to Googles proposed "Web Integrity" API recently. It recived a huge negative backlash and in return they dropped the idea, for now...

But if you're asking if "blatent and transparent" polices are better than the ones that are not, then the answer to that is a big fat YES ofcourse they are. I personally have had enough of google and microsoft so im staying away from their serivces as much as I possible can.

[–] jarfil 5 points 1 year ago

Shining light on a problem is a good step to make people realize there is a problem in the first place.

What the fuck are you going to do about it?

Start a meme campaign targeted at countries with privacy legislations, aimed at making their future governments ask for ~~higher bribes~~ more lobbying before signing away taxpayer money to Microsoft contracts...

I mean, ideally have Microsoft rethink its approach, like Meta is rethinking its with Instagram, but let's start with something simple.

[–] WinterBear 2 points 1 year ago

Yeah we should just never do anything if it doesn't instantly fix the problem.