this post was submitted on 04 Nov 2023
1023 points (95.4% liked)

Memes

45307 readers
1788 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 48 points 11 months ago (5 children)

Just wait until someone connect chatgpt to one of those gigantic 3d printers that print buildings.

Are we really that far from having “AI” do this?

[–] FlyingSquid 20 points 11 months ago (17 children)

You can't 3D print laying all the pipe and the electric cabling and adding fixtures and insulation and all sorts of other things homes need.

You can 3D print the basic structure. That's it. You're saving on bricklaying or carpentry.

[–] ImpossibilityBox 13 points 11 months ago (2 children)

And the second that it is economically viable the companies will be dumping their bricklayers/carpenters down the drain and replacing them with computer controlled construction methods.

[–] FlyingSquid 6 points 11 months ago (2 children)

When will it be economically viable to dump all the people who have to set up the equipment and all of the people who have to do everything but make the basic structure? Is this 'house set up and entirely built by robots down to the light fixtures with no human intervention' a near future proposition?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

When was it economically viable to replace hand-sewn lumber with lumber mills?

Then they went and made portable electric saws. What a world!

And then electric drills! And laser levels!

Remember paper ledgers and abacuses? Ever hear of Microsoft Excel?

We keep making tools that always increase productivity and reduce time and cost. It’s Constant incremental progress, and on a large scale it’s great because it frees up (human) resources to focus on new industry and technology, which furthers the CIP. On the micro scale, there may be a small number of temporarily displaced workers as jobs shuffle around and workers re-skill.

But at this particular intersection of technology, we are at a pretty bad spot. We are on the verge of massive progress in multiple industries, and wealth has concentrated in the elite classes. “Temporarily displaced workers” won’t have the capital to re-skill or invest their own resources into new industry. This is bad.

[–] FlyingSquid 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

When was it economically viable to replace hand-sewn lumber with lumber mills?

When they did it. Because they could process a huge amount more lumber. I'm not sure I understand.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 11 months ago

what they are saying is that in the past, technological leaps meant increases in productivity and generally freed the displaced workers into new careers, but this time the sheer scale of change that is imminent doesn't leave time for that. it's going to be bad

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Damn, you really are stuck in the past, aren't ya

[–] FlyingSquid 5 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I'm stuck in the past because that's not an economically viable thing to do within the foreseeable future?

Would I be stuck in the past because I said I don't think people are going to be commuting by personal jetpack any time soon?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)
[–] FlyingSquid 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Sorry... you honestly think people will commute by personal jetpack one day?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)
[–] FlyingSquid 4 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Because it's a stupid fucking idea.

Are you under the bizarre impression that every prediction about the future will come true at some point?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Are you under the bizzar impression that the world is going to stay the same as it is now?

[–] FlyingSquid 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Literally anything I put is an answer to you

[–] FlyingSquid 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Nope. I asked you if literally any prediction about the future will come true. Please answer the question.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)
[–] FlyingSquid 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Nope. That still doesn't answer my question. Yet again: Will literally every prediction about the future come true?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Will infinite monkeys eventually write all of Shakespeare?

[–] FlyingSquid 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Very suspicious that you refuse to answer a yes or no question. I'm starting to think I should report you for trolling.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Report me all you want dummy. I literally answered "yup" long ago and you're still digging like you're going to accomplish something.

[–] FlyingSquid 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Ah, I guess I missed your answer. If every prediction about the future is true, it includes all the predictions that humanity will be wiped out relatively soon, meaning that house building will never be fully automated and no one will commute by personal jetpack. But also all housing will be automated and people will commute by personal jetpack.

At the same time.

I can't wait to see how you resolve civilization simultaneously collapsing and advancing.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)
[–] FlyingSquid 2 points 11 months ago (9 children)

No, I'm really not getting it. I don't get how two completely opposite things can simultaneously happen. That sounds literally impossible to me.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] sleepy555 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, like how blacksmiths can't find any work these days anymore. It's heartbreaking.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 11 months ago

There are artisan blacksmiths that probably make bank doing custom jobs like blades and ironwork gates and other such artistry.

load more comments (16 replies)
[–] Acters 7 points 11 months ago

Still need someone to build it for the computer. What would really help the "AI" is to have something that can handle the creation of different interfaces and modules. Then, it would need to solve or mitigate the maintenance conundrum of repairing itself when it breaks.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Not so much of the physical building, but I bet the designing isn't too big of a stretch. Think something like procedural generation to make 2/3 of a floor plan and have humans make sure it makes sense and add details.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago

Unfortunately, those building 3D printers are mostly just a publicity stunt currently. Too impractical to use at any sort of scale.

Now, if we were to combine AI with the old Sears kit homes, we might be onto something. Given a standardized list of stuff like room dimensions and the materials required for their construction, AI could probably generate an endless number of variations of both houses and additions for them with an exact list of required construction materials and equipment. Entire series of standardized houses with all the materials prepped ahead of time, ready to just be delivered to a plot of land and constructed on site by a local construction companies, with only minor adjustments required to account for the specific peculiarities of the area. The IKEA of house construction.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

Shit tears itself down in 2 weeks