this post was submitted on 01 Nov 2023
742 points (97.7% liked)

Technology

60020 readers
3036 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Highlights: The White House issued draft rules today that would require federal agencies to evaluate and constantly monitor algorithms used in health care, law enforcement, and housing for potential discrimination or other harmful effects on human rights.

Once in effect, the rules could force changes in US government activity dependent on AI, such as the FBI’s use of face recognition technology, which has been criticized for not taking steps called for by Congress to protect civil liberties. The new rules would require government agencies to assess existing algorithms by August 2024 and stop using any that don’t comply.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] -3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

All you care about is if you get a fancy new toy, and to hell with everyone else’s rights.

AI isn't just a toy. It's a potentially world changing technology and the government wants to ensure the common person doesn't have any control over how it's used.

Denying access to the common person will be the largest act of theft of power from the people to big companies this century.

And like I said. I'm not an idiot who votes for other people. I vote for my interests. Banning AI makes that my interest. Without such a threat, I'll vote for other common goods, because those benefit me as well.

[–] ElectroNeutrino 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Like I said, epitome of, "fuck you, I got mine." You don't care about the rights of other's because yours aren't under threat.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Except something I want is under threat.

You're just pissed I don't prioritize issues that don't effect me when issues that very much do come up.

And I've seen enough of the world to know how that goes. If you don't stand up for what matters to you, nobody will and everything you have will be slowly eroded away.

[–] ElectroNeutrino 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Reading comprehension, you lack it.

Your life, liberty and health aren't under attack, so you don't give a shit about the life, liberty, or health of others. That's what, "fuck you, I got mine," means.

Edit: Also, the irony of you talking about, "everything you have will be slowly eroded away," while proudly saying you don't care about the erosion of the rights of others is not lost on me.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah, that's just you being pissed I don't vote for other people before myself.

Fuck you got mine would be if, on knowing issues I don't care about are resolved, I started voting against people's rights.

This is "fuck you, don't got mine". Once I got mine the fuck you will go away.

[–] ElectroNeutrino 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

But you've said it yourself, you would vote against other people's rights if it meant fewer things, "getting in the way of open source algorithms."

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Well, I wouldn't vote for AI if the advancement of AI required we don't mandate police cameras.

But it doesn't. The Democrats can easily both support rights and AI. It's their choice not to and if they make that choice they lose my vote.

[–] ElectroNeutrino 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Need I remind you of your initial comment?

Delay llama 3 and I’m voting for whoever runs against Biden. No exceptions, I will become a single issue voter and this will be my issue.

No exceptions also includes even if the person running against Biden wants to take away your right to vote or bodily autonomy.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The Democrats can easily both support rights and AI. It's their choice not to and if they make that choice they lose my vote.

[–] ElectroNeutrino 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

No exceptions, I will become a single issue voter and this will be my issue.

Edit: I think you're starting to realize that you've blustered yourself into a corner.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

That doesn't contradict what I said at all.

[–] ElectroNeutrino 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

You've said, repeatedly, that you would vote for AI over rights. It's your single issue, and have even pointed out that Democrats can support both, but if they don't support AI you'll vote against them regardless of what their opponents support.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yes, because that's my primary issue.

If it was some other issue I'd flip flop my vote based on that. If I didn't have any issues like that I'd vote on the "generic best party" and generally that's the Democrats.

If I were voting against people's rights I'd just always vote straight ticket Republican.

[–] ElectroNeutrino 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

You've made it clear that you would vote Republican if the Democrats don't support AI.

And since you have said it yourself that it would be voting against people's rights to do so, you've made it clear that you are okay voting against people's rights if it means voting for AI, which is exactly how the rights of everyone get eroded.