this post was submitted on 02 Nov 2023
64 points (100.0% liked)

Australian News

550 readers
97 users here now

A place to share and discuss news relating to Australia and Australians.

Rules
  1. Follow the aussie.zone rules
  2. Keep discussions civil and respectful
  3. Exclude profanity from post titles
  4. Exclude excessive profanity from comments
  5. Satire is allowed, however post titles must be prefixed with [satire]
Recommended and Related Communities

Be sure to check out and subscribe to our related communities on aussie.zone:

Plus other communities for sport and major cities.

https://aussie.zone/communities

Banner: ABC

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
64
Only 2% of freight between Melbourne and Sydney goes by rail – putting Australia’s emissions targets at risk (www.theguardian.com)
submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
11 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] -4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Trains don't go to every supermarket. Trucks still have to put the freight on a train and then take it off again at the other end. Train makes sense for large items with a single destination such as raw materials for processing etc, but for stuff that's gotta to go to a myriad of destinations, a truck can often get it there with less handling.

PS - kbin signing me out every so often is starting to give me the sh**s.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

If our planning was better, the majority of freight absolutely could go by train. Yes, you'll need trucks for the last mile, but trains are so much more efficient. Trucks do a huge amount of damage to the roads, and they require way more labour than a train does (because one truck carries way less than one train, so you need way more trucks).