this post was submitted on 31 Oct 2023
252 points (90.6% liked)

Games

32731 readers
2700 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Weekly Threads:

What Are You Playing?

The Weekly Discussion Topic

Rules:

  1. Submissions have to be related to games

  2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

  3. No excessive self-promotion

  4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

  5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

  6. No linking to piracy

More information about the community rules can be found here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Literally a used Switch game in a big, ridiculous bag with a “New” sticker on it. Imagine going into a GameStop with a game in a bag like this and convincing them to give you credit for it as “New”.

Don’t buy online from GameStop. Actually, just don’t buy from GameStop.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I think there was more to it than that. It seemed more like a situation where they could kill two birds with one stone. They could destroy, or at least severely damage the stock market by ensuring the hedgefunds couldn't buy back the shorted stock, and even if they didn't, they had the chance to become extremely wealthy while trying.

It probably would have worked too if it weren't for ~~those meddling kids~~ stock brokers like Robin Hood working with hedgefunds to claw back stocks and the SEC towering over them with potential charges of market manipulation.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago

It never would have worked. The absolute best case scenario was one hedgefund company has less profit that year.

[–] DingoBilly 13 points 1 year ago

Destroy or severely damage the stock market? It was just one stock, some people lost money but it didn't affect 99%+ of the stock market or its traders.... Just a little meme blip on the scale of things.