this post was submitted on 29 Oct 2023
41 points (95.6% liked)
CanadaPolitics
1870 readers
46 users here now
Placeholder for any r/CanadaPolitics refugees
Rules:
All of Lemmy.ca's rules apply
- No bigotry - including racism, sexism, ableism, homophobia, transphobia, or xenophobia.
- Be respectful. Everyone should feel welcome here.
- No porn.
- No Ads / Spamming.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
The Federal government has an obligation to negotiate or otherwise try to reduce this bill. It's public funds, and. I dont think they should just take the lawyers word for it in what they are able to bill.
Don't want to pay a purchasing lawyers bill? Don't get sued.
Sure, but this just isn't true. It's normal in Canada for a losing party to dispute the opposition councils bill on the grounds of hourly rates, disbursements and time spent. In some provinces the dispute is handled by a regulatory body, or you can go back to court to figure it out.
The dispute isn't about not paying, it's about ensuring that they pay a reasonable amount. And since the federal government is spending public money, they have the obligation to ensure the rate is reasonable and pursue disputes when they think it isn't reasonable.
If the federal government didn't act in this way, they'd be on the hook for unreasonable fees every time they lost a case.