this post was submitted on 28 Oct 2023
355 points (97.8% liked)

Technology

59707 readers
5420 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
L3s
[email protected]
[email protected]
L4s
enu
355
US immigration enforcement used an AI-powered tool to scan social media posts "derogatory" to the US | "The government should not be using algorithms to scrutinize our social media posts" (www.techspot.com)
submitted 1 year ago by L4s to c/technology
32 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

US immigration enforcement used an AI-powered tool to scan social media posts "derogatory" to the US | "The government should not be using algorithms to scrutinize our social media posts"::undefined

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] kromem 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Technically until they have successfully immigrated there's limited first amendment rights.

As the supreme court has found over and over, given there is no inherent legal right to enter the country, there is no infringement of rights to discriminate who can and can't enter based on political speech. For prior cases if you are interested, see:

  • Exclusion of a British anarchist was at issue in Turner v. Williams (1904).
  • Harisiades v. Shaughnessy (1952) concerned deportation of communists.
  • Kleindienst v. Mandel (1972) examined denial of a travel visa to a Marxist.

So while ethically you may feel it's an infringement of the principles of the first amendment, it is not currently seen that way legally and hasn't for a long while.