this post was submitted on 25 Oct 2023
406 points (97.9% liked)

Ukraine

8312 readers
986 users here now

News and discussion related to Ukraine

*Sympathy for enemy combatants is prohibited.

*No content depicting extreme violence or gore.

*Posts containing combat footage should include [Combat] in title

*Combat videos containing any footage of a visible human must be flagged NSFW

Server Rules

  1. Remember the human! (no harassment, threats, etc.)
  2. No racism or other discrimination
  3. No Nazis, QAnon or similar
  4. No porn
  5. No ads or spam (includes charities)
  6. No content against Finnish law

Donate to support Ukraine's Defense

Donate to support Humanitarian Aid


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] The_v 19 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Anti-material rifles were initially designed to take out tanks. However all modern tanks have thick enough armor to deflect its bullets.

Now APC's, trucks, vans, and most engines and electronics are destroyed by these rounds. Hence the anti-material label now.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago

Given some of the antique tanks the Russians pulled out of the moth ball heap, it might still be an anti-tank-weapon occasionally ...

[–] worldsayshi 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Would it be possible to ruin the barrel by shooting at it from the side? Or would it just ricochet?

[–] The_v 15 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The barrel is thicker than the armor on tanks. Usually they weigh in at over 2 tons of steel. The circular shape also makes it very likely to deflect the impact like sloped armor.

It might make a little ding in the paint.

[–] ours 6 points 1 year ago

They are designed to withstand huge pressures while maintaining their structure.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

She must be very strong if she can hold up 4 tons of steel.