this post was submitted on 25 Oct 2023
11 points (82.4% liked)

Open Source

32036 readers
33 users here now

All about open source! Feel free to ask questions, and share news, and interesting stuff!

Useful Links

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon from opensource.org, but we are not affiliated with them.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Do you think that it’s possible to build a web service to chat compatible with email , xmpp and matrix?
(and why not even with activityPub or rocketChat ?? )

[exemple and why in the post...]

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 3arn0wl 1 points 1 year ago (12 children)

I've wondered before now about an e-mail system which hosts the emails on one's own device, and uses the activity-pub protocol : decentralised email, I guess...

The closest I've seen is Tox.

[–] mypasswordis1234 15 points 1 year ago (7 children)

E-mail is already decentralised

[–] 3arn0wl 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

They're kept on other people's servers, is what I meant.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You can run your own mail server and keep your emails on a device you control instead of e.g., gmail.

It's non-trivial so most people stick with letting someone else handle it. Just like you're probably not running your own Lemmy instance, but Lemmy is still decentralized.

[–] 3arn0wl 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Hehe You answered your own statement! If it were ever to become non-trivial : I'd certainly do it (even though I know people who do, are bombarded with spam).

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] 3arn0wl 2 points 1 year ago

:) Thank you. Yes Mail in a box has been around for a while. Still not straightforward, though.

[–] mypasswordis1234 0 points 1 year ago
[–] breadsmasher 1 points 1 year ago

Just like messages on any given lemmy instance is hosted on their servers.

Decentralisation comes from the fact you can run your own instance (or email server)

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)