Technology
This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.
Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.
Rules:
1: All Lemmy rules apply
2: Do not post low effort posts
3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff
4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.
5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)
6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist
7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed
view the rest of the comments
That seems like the reverse. The high rate environment made startups stingy which (along with that one newsletter saying SVB ran out of money) caused the run that killed SVB.
To be fair, SVB kind of did run out of money. They invested heavily into Treasuries, so as rates increased, their investments were devalued, which meant they wouldn't be able to cover their debts if they sold everything or if withdrawals significantly outpaced contributions.
The banks that remained solvent diversified their investments.
The real cause of this is inflation. The Fed raised rates to combat inflation, and raising rates increases their own rate for borrowing, meaning Treasury yields increase, which means new Treasuries are more attractive than older Treasuries, which means older Treasuries sell for less than face value if not held to maturity. The causes of the rampant inflation are varied and include:
All of that combined led the Treasury rates to increase faster than most expected, which meant a lot of longer term Treasury investors were left holding depreciating investments.
In short, SVB ran too much risk and were punished for it.