this post was submitted on 22 Oct 2023
106 points (99.1% liked)

Seattle

1655 readers
42 users here now

A community for news and discussion of Seattle, Washington and the surrounding area

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 year ago (4 children)

If approved, property owners in the city would pay 45 cents per $1,000 of their property’s assessed value. That amounts to about $385 a year for the owner of a median $855,000 home, an increase of about $260 a year from the present levy rate.

……..median price? 😬

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago

Bellevue across the lake has a median price of over $1.3 million. The prices are currently down YoY for both cities.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Hence why Seattle needs more affordable housing. Now that HB 1110 allows denser housing in formerly single family zones Seattle Needs to become a city of fourplexes

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I’d argue more than four. Since the population is spiraling out of control, we should expect a need for large towers. It’s also an efficient use of space and if they are dense enough, could have all the shopping one needs to live in a few blocks. And it should be affordable assuming “market rate” goes down with supply, and that the owners don’t prop up the rental market

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Tue but smaller.buildings have lower coat per SQ ft and Seattle is mostly single family homes at the moment so even fourplexes would hypotheticallyincrease supply by 3x

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

At this point, all the people who can't afford to live in these cities, while providing all the services that a city needs to run and the entertainment, should just abandon them enmasse. If we could find a way to organize something like that, it would be incredible.

[–] surewhynotlem -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That would mean at least one house at 250k and at least one at 1.5m. that's not exactly crazy.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

There are no houses in the 250k range. Not even a townhome.

[–] surewhynotlem -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Then there are also few houses in the 1.5mil range. Yay median!

[–] SpaceNoodle 1 points 1 year ago

It could also mean every house is the median price except for one that's fifteen trillion dollars.