this post was submitted on 22 Jun 2023
17 points (94.7% liked)

Formula 1

8987 readers
257 users here now

Welcome to Formula1 @ Lemmy.world Lemmy's largest community for Formula 1 and related racing series

Rules

  1. Be respectful to everyone; drivers, lemmings, redditors etc
  2. No gambling, crypto or NFTs
  3. Spoilers are allowed
  4. Non English articles should include a translation in the comments by deepl.com or similar
  5. Paywalled articles should include at least a brief summary in the comments, the wording of the article should not be altered
  6. Social media posts should be posted as screenshots with a link for those who want to view it
  7. Memes are allowed on Monday only as we all do like a laugh or 2, but don’t want to become formuladank.

Up next

F1 Calendar

2024 Calendar

Location Date
🇸🇬 Singapore 20-22 Sep
🇺🇸 United States 18-20 Oct
🇲🇽 Mexico 25-27 Oct
🇧🇷 Brazil 01-03 Nov
🇺🇸 United States 21-23 Nov
🇶🇦 Qatar 29 Nov-01 Dec
🇦🇪 Abu Dhabi 06-08 Dec

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Photographer
wes
bwoah
17
Undercut impact will be added factor in final F1 tyre warmer ban decision (www.autosport.com)
submitted 1 year ago by Ippei to c/formula1
11 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Formula 1 supplier Pirelli says the impact on racing of a potential tyre warmer ban, with it potentially killing off the undercut, will be added factor in the final decision.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] healer_56 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

i think the whole tyre discussion is outdated anyway.

at some point they will realize that all that microplastic is bad for the environment and they will ban tyres that practically destroy themselves.

i have been saying already they should switch to a different limiting factor than tyres. Maybe force them to use much bigger batteries that are plug and play. and give them options of different power/weight/amount or something like that.

[–] Ippei 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Bring back refueling?

[–] ascagnel 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Because they banned it on safety grounds (instead of “Renault 100% used this to cheat” grounds), they boxed themselves into a corner on ever bringing it back — there’s still the risk of occasional fire from a few drops of leaked fuel, even with today’s improved fueling apparatus.

[–] Ippei 2 points 1 year ago

I don't know, I'm sure they'd find a way around it if they really wanted to bring refueling back. Honestly, I'd be in favor.