this post was submitted on 18 Oct 2023
180 points (98.4% liked)

Canada

7275 readers
226 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


πŸ—ΊοΈ Provinces / Territories


πŸ™οΈ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


πŸ’ SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


πŸ’» Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


πŸ’΅ Finance, Shopping, Sales


πŸ—£οΈ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I guarantee that corporations would simply start adding more cheap fillers to food if they were forced to comply with standardized size/weight requirements.

You'd get saline solution being injected into moisture rich foods, to increase their perceived weight, you'd have dry foods combined with super cheap fillers to give them more weight (but less actual food), etc.

Consumers are always the loser.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago

They already do that. Regulate that too.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

You kind of already have that. I'm pretty sure that the mass of anything in the grocery store includes the maximum amount of allowed cheap mass.

Standardised packaging sizes would just reduce wastage from inconvenient package sizes and streamline packaging operations. Remember the giant plastic clamshell packaging of 10-15 years ago? Takes up more space on the shelves, can make a small product noticable, and was annoying as hell and wasteful too.