this post was submitted on 12 Oct 2023
305 points (97.5% liked)

World News

39162 readers
2431 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] g0nz0li0 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Interesting. I'm curious why you aren't familiar with the details of constitutional amendment I linked to. You're clearly not basing your opinion on primary sources, so what secondary sources are you consuming?

[–] 0ddysseus 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What makes you think I'm unfamiliar with it? I know exactly what it says, regardless of whether I'm a shit debater

[–] g0nz0li0 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Maybe because you keep claiming information hasn't been made available when a simple google search proves you wrong?

[–] 0ddysseus 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] g0nz0li0 1 points 1 year ago

I have the receipts. Here's false statements you made that I corrected using easily available resource you refuse to acknowledge.

not fucking one has presented any argument as to what this body will actually do to change anything.

And

Nobody has any fucking clue what powers it might have, its a blank check. Show one fucking piece of evidence that there is any public plan for what this "advisory body" can and can't do, or shut the fuck up.

And

There is literally no scope included - they'll decide after

And

And all this done by a group of people or an individual chosen through unspecified means with unspecified credentials.

All of these are defined and you have wrongly claimed otherwise. You're a rube.