this post was submitted on 13 Oct 2023
671 points (99.0% liked)

Technology

59664 readers
3278 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

T-Mobile switches users to pricier plans and tells them it’s not a price hike::T-Mobile: "We are not raising the price... we are moving you to a newer plan."

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (6 children)

I genuinely don't understand why so many people go with the network brand. AFAIK all of the US networks have MVNO's that operate on their networks at much lower cost. Some of those virtual operators are even owned by the big guys, e.g. Cricket on ATT. My coworkers pay literally hundreds of dollars more per month than is necessary, and what, they get a few Mbps faster data rates? Is that really worth it?

Edit: TIL a lot of people have had a hard time with MVNO's. My experience has been excellent and consistent, but that apparently doesn't generalize.

[–] Ennon 15 points 1 year ago (2 children)

In more populated areas it makes sense since Brand customers have prioritized traffic over MVNOs. So if you want any service at all, then…

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago

I have both T-Mobile and Visible on my phone and I've had to switch to Visible in more congested areas because T-Mobile will crawl.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I've never had any issues with the Tmobile prepaid plan in either NYC nor north NJ, although I'm not sure if the prepaid plans have the same lowered priority as Mint, for example.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

I have used StraightTalk a couple years ago with the T-Mobile SIM. In the countryside, I could barely do anything, whereas my friend on prepaid T-Mobile worked "as normal" as you'd expect. So their MVNO priorities are a bit of a gamble.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

In SoCal it can get pretty bad, and I've been to Disneyland and other events (concerts/sports) where the phone simply doesn't work at all. I'm on a Verizon MVNO right now that seems to be fine, but the AT&T and T-Mobile based ones both have issues around here.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Right I'm saying does the prepaid T-Mobile plan count as an MVNO? If it's directly from them vs a separate company like Mint

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

No, it isn't an MVNO, but I do think it gets lower priority than their premium plans.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

This is correct, as many people have pointed out though, this is an urban issue. Priority data doesn't really play into the world of rural users who don't have enough people in town to congest their single tower

[–] scottywh 1 points 1 year ago

I didn't have any issues with Metro when I lived in San Diego and Apple Valley back in 2015 through early 2016.

[–] Jimmycakes 10 points 1 year ago

Because those are way lower down the priority list when it comes to network congestion. If you are in a populated area your service will suffer.

[–] krakenx 4 points 1 year ago

T-Mobile bought Mint. Verizon bought Tracphone, which owns Straight Talk. There aren't many independent MVNOs left. And the ones that are are being deprioritized to the point where the service basically doesn't work when the tower is busy.

[–] livedeified 3 points 1 year ago

I hope this doesn't translate to a higher cost for Google Fi in the future.

[–] Molecular0079 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Problem with MVNOs is that they get swallowed up or go defunct. I don't need my data transferring hands nor do I want to deal with switching cellphone plans. I just need it to work.

They also have terrible options for international data.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I've stuck with T-Mobile largely for the international data (plus the grandfathered plan I have) but unless you travel intentionally every month it's likely cheaper to just get an in-country eSIM plan to cover you for traveling.

[–] Molecular0079 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

do you have a consistent source for these eSIMs? The thing that's always held me back was that it was just another thing I have to worry about while traveling.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Holafly is decent.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

This is what I did when I visited the UK a few years ago. I paid about $30 and I was covered for the entire trip.

[–] scottywh 2 points 1 year ago

My experience is similar to yours.

I've had Metro for years...

Before they existed there was a time when I had service directly through T-Mobile and before they became T-Mobile, Voicestream.

Metro is great... Super affordable and works as well as full fledged T-Mobile for me.

I think part of it for a lot of people is that MVNOs typically don't offer financing on phones and they don't always have the flagships available.