this post was submitted on 22 Jun 2023
907 points (93.1% liked)

Memes

45645 readers
1111 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
907
Rich Lives matter (libranet.de)
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 

But F the poor I guess

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago (3 children)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

... Of course it is? We have things like taxation and social safety nets that allow a society to function. Never mind the simple fact that some places are stressed for resources as it is. That's not to say it can't be done better, but it's naive to think it's "simple". Never mind that simple doesn't necessarily mean easy...

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

@usualsuspect191

We have things like taxation due to capitalism's inability to create a just society.

There, I fixed it for ya 😉

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I'm having a difficult time thinking of any form of society where people don't pool at least some portion of their surplus to help the group as a whole (and lift those up who have a deficit). Are you saying that shouldn't be a thing?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yes it is, where will we house these migrants?

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

@Ronno @Banana this sounds very similar to "who will pick the cotton?" that was "just asking questions" as to why slavery should remain legal in the southern united states in the 19th century. It's the right thing to do. One's individual rights does not force obligations on the other. A freed market would provide.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

IMO, those are very different situations, with slavery their freedom was taken. Most of the migrants (not refugees) are free, they are simply in search for a better life. Which is understandable, don't get me wrong. But the picture that is painted is too bright, people hop on a boat to "paradise" and are promised a life of riches. The reality is, this is not the situation they will find themselves in. Even if we were to allow them into the country, they would still live poor lives. Sure some will succeed, but most of them don't have the foundational knowledge/skills/command of the language of the country to get a job and find a place to live.

Meanwhile, looking at my own country The Netherlands, we see that natives are also struggling for housing. My generation is basically fucked, young families cannot buy nor rent a home to start their family in. This will impact The Netherlands for years/decades to come, it will be reflected in birth rate and future workforce. Allowing other people in the country now would be catastrophic.

On the other hand, recently there was an article about an approach by French farmers which I like. They sourced Moroccan workers, that could work in France for a couple months (IIRC max stay was 3 months), during this time, the workers would receive fair pay. After the work permit ends, the workers have to go back to Morocco. Then they are only allowed to go back to work in France after a period of time, with a new workers permit.

The key benefit is that workers bring the money back home, benefitting Morocco financially, and France with workforce. Most of this work by the farmers is seasonal anyway.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago

@Ronno @Banana sounds like you need to migrate too.