this post was submitted on 09 Oct 2023
1065 points (97.8% liked)

People Twitter

5456 readers
353 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Son_of_dad 17 points 1 year ago (36 children)

Maybe the movie you liked has a trans character or female hero and got review bombed

[–] ThePantser -5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (34 children)

Well when the character makes sense or it really doesn't matter, it works. But when it's shoehorned in and there is that one scene where they tell their backstory or explain their identity and it's out of the blue and takes you out of the story at hand it's bad and really ruins the movie.

[–] twelvefloatinghands 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I think you're being downvoted for this because, even if it's a good point in isolation, it's in the direction of "trans person bad", and thus indistinguishable from a transphobe adopting the point without believing it. You gotta include a few instances of "_____ did it really well. We need more like that." to balance it out.

[–] STUPIDVIPGUY 3 points 1 year ago

The problem is that it isn't a good point in isolation, it's a point uttered only by people who are bothered by the presence of queer characters

[–] ThePantser -3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Sorry my fist sentence was meant to be a positive one. ST Discovery did it well with the Trill, Trell? Character.

Also USA Shameless had a character that flowed well with the story line.

load more comments (31 replies)
load more comments (32 replies)