this post was submitted on 08 Oct 2023
465 points (98.7% liked)

Work Reform

10044 readers
933 users here now

A place to discuss positive changes that can make work more equitable, and to vent about current practices. We are NOT against work; we just want the fruits of our labor to be recognized better.

Our Philosophies:

Our Goals

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Staff at CD Projekt Red are uniting with others in the Polish video game industry to unionise. The union was formed aft…

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Wogi 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You have demonstrated a complete lack of even a basic understanding of two entirely different industries with one post. Congratulations

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

You have not said anything of any worthwhile meaning. Your comment serves no purpose other than to garner upvotes. Can you please be specific?

[–] TsarVul 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

CDPR is a publicly traded company with a clearly represented shareholder structure. A collective known as "Other" owns about 65% of the company's shares. CDPR upper management have a fiduciary duty to this entity. This duty was honored when they decided to release early. They knew that the hype train was so intense that whatever they released, it would sell like icy lemonade in the Sahara. It's not like they didn't have access to Sony devkits and shit, they knew the performance was sub-optimal. They're not dumb. They were just OK with temporary backlash that would eventually get amended with a successful anime, some patches and DLC.

Now on to actors. Actors, whether A or Z-list, work for a flat fee and maybe royalties if they got really really lucky. Once they have completed their performance, their end of the contract is complete. They get paid and that's that. They just wait for royalties to be exercised (if they have them).

Having said so, the idea that Keanu's agents hold any post-payment sway in comparison to the collective that owns literally more than 65% of the company is a bit silly. This is why you're getting a little bit of backlash on what you have written. Especially in that you did not preface your original comment with "Hey, this is a theory, a game theory".