this post was submitted on 04 Oct 2023
76 points (95.2% liked)

Technology

59665 readers
3602 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
L3s
[email protected]
[email protected]
L4s
enu
76
AI beats human sleuth at finding problematic images in research papers (www.nature.com)
submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/technology
11 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

An algorithm that takes just seconds to scan a paper for duplicated images racks up more suspicious images than a person.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] AbidanYre 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

For classification, sure. But based on the article that's not what they were doing here. This was just comparing an image to a bunch of other images to see if it was the same.

[โ€“] Zeth0s 1 points 1 year ago

To see if they are similar. They are not interested to see if the image is the same but to understand if the message is the same, to the level that it is a fraud, not simple citation. They are flagging frauds...

I have no idea how they do it, and I strongly believe it is an overkill given that the credibility of published research is low due to the mafia-like academic system, not because of few frauds.