this post was submitted on 05 Oct 2023
285 points (98.0% liked)

Firefox

16764 readers
64 users here now

A place to discuss the news and latest developments on the open-source browser Firefox

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 4 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Not necessarily. You could use something like DNSCrypt locally as a resolver which is more private than DoH and this weird combination of the opt-out will hurt you in this case.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Yes I had missed the part of the article where they described their opt-out behavior.

There is no technical reason for them to do it that way and it is a poor way of automatically determining an opt-out for the sake of not pissing off enterprise users (who rely on SNI for filtering). It is needlessly hostile to tie this privacy future to a different one instead of just using a separate toggle and corporate policy setting. ECH isn't DNS and shouldn't be tied to the DNS server setting.

For a local annoying example, NextDNS automatically blocks DoH via the canary domain use-application-dns.net. If I set my router up to use NextDNS over DoH, Firefox automatically disables DoH and ECH internally. I want it to use my router's DNS, because everything is centrally logged, automatically organized by hostname, and it does local caching. I'd still rather my ISP can't view SNI information. If I want ECH I have to manually enable DoH on every machine, and do more hoops if I want central logging to work correctly.

Regarding no technical reason, you can return these public keys from any normal DNS:

$ dig +short crypto.cloudflare.com TYPE65
1 . alpn="http/1.1,h2" ipv4hint=162.159.137.85,162.159.138.85 ech=AEX+DQBBvgAgACCLKBP960E1dfY35YFbosHcVzvpz1E4fsqxzwGhtPpZagAEAAEAAQASY2xvdWRmbGFyZS1lY2guY29tAAA= ipv6hint=2606:4700:7::a29f:8955,2606:4700:7::a29f:8a55
[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago (2 children)

How so? I’m using unbound locally for recursive DNS, but I’ll checkout what DNSCrypt adds since it seems like local encrypted DNS to the recursive servers.

Wouldn’t ECH still work with this setup and this setup be more secure since you’re not handing off your DNS requests to some other company?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

It would work, except Firefox is configured to not use ECH if it is not using DoH. I updated my original reply after testing it out. Hopefully they update this behavior in the future, it is very user-hostile right now.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago

Basically DNSCrypt is designed to hide your IP from the DNS server and your DNS query from your ISP. Basically it relays your DNS query via one server which knows your IP but only sees and encrypted version of your query and response and one server which knows your query but not your IP. Obviously you want both servers to be run by two different organizations.