this post was submitted on 03 Oct 2023
211 points (95.3% liked)

Linux

47178 readers
786 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

if you could pick a standard format for a purpose what would it be and why?

e.g. flac for lossless audio because...

(yes you can add new categories)

summary:

  1. photos .jxl
  2. open domain image data .exr
  3. videos .av1
  4. lossless audio .flac
  5. lossy audio .opus
  6. subtitles srt/ass
  7. fonts .otf
  8. container mkv (doesnt contain .jxl)
  9. plain text utf-8 (many also say markup but disagree on the implementation)
  10. documents .odt
  11. archive files (this one is causing a bloodbath so i picked randomly) .tar.zst
  12. configuration files toml
  13. typesetting typst
  14. interchange format .ora
  15. models .gltf / .glb
  16. daw session files .dawproject
  17. otdr measurement results .xml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 46 points 11 months ago (28 children)

Ogg Opus for all lossy audio compression (mp3 needs to die)

7z or tar.zst for general purpose compression (zip and rar need to die)

[–] dinckelman 23 points 11 months ago (5 children)

The existence of zip, and especially rar files, actually hurts me. It's slow, it's insecure, and the compression is from the jurassic era. We can do better

[–] [email protected] -5 points 11 months ago (1 children)

@dinckelman @Supermariofan67 I think you mean unsecure. It doesn't feel unsure of itself. 😁

[–] [email protected] 14 points 11 months ago (2 children)

in·se·cure (ĭn′sĭ-kyo͝or′) adj.

  1. Inadequately guarded or protected; unsafe: A shortage of military police made the air base insecure.

https://www.thefreedictionary.com/insecure

Unsecure

a. 1. Insecure.

https://www.thefreedictionary.com/Unsecure

[–] [email protected] 4 points 11 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

One thing I didn't appreciate about English until reading a Europe forum for a while is that it has a lot of different prefixes that mean something like "not", and this is not very intuitive to people learning the language. Their use is not regular.

Consider:

  • "a-" as in "atypical"

  • "non-" as in "nonconsentual"

  • "un-" as in "uncooperative"

  • "im-" as in "immortal"

  • "in-" as in "inconsiderate"

  • "il-" as in "illegitimate"

  • "mal-" as in "maladjusted"

  • "anti-" as in "anti-establishment"

  • "de-" as in "deconstruct"

And sometimes, some of the prefixes are associated with base words to form real words with similar meanings, but meanings that are not the same. For example, "immoral" and "amoral" do not mean the same thing, though they have related meanings.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 11 months ago

@hungprocess Also this. https://english.stackexchange.com/questions/19653/insecure-or-unsecure-when-dealing-with-security

It seems that I was quite wrong, but that a lot of other people are wrong as well. lol

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (25 replies)