this post was submitted on 02 Oct 2023
317 points (97.3% liked)

Technology

60052 readers
3233 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Major airline faces backlash after using ‘ghost flights’ to exploit a legal loophole: ‘They weren’t even selling tickets’::Ultimately, it’s incumbent on lawmakers to take steps to ensure this practice is discouraged.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Jackcooper 7 points 1 year ago (6 children)

So I get how that's bad for the environment and all

But why are their flights limited to 28 in the first place?

[–] doczombie 21 points 1 year ago (5 children)

There is a bit of a scandal in aus at the moment about this. Qatar asked for more international flights (they back Virgin Australia, one of 2 major domestic carriers in Australia). Government said no, for undisclosed reasons.

The "national" carrier Qantas are scumbags with the government in their pocket and likely quietly lobbied against it, but also Qatar International Airport did this to Australian citizens not that long ago:

https://amp.abc.net.au/article/12817070

So it's just kind of dickheads all the way down.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah... fuck Qatar for that, goddamn thats a human rights violation if I ever saw one

[–] WHYAREWEALLCAPS 4 points 1 year ago

Like Qatar gives a good god damn about human rights.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)