this post was submitted on 29 Sep 2023
406 points (95.1% liked)

Technology

60084 readers
3861 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Any Chromium and Firefox browser prior to version 116 will be vulnerable to this, update your browsers.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Lantern 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It’s a format that most major image editors don’t support. Basically, if you wanted to do anything with it, you need to first convert it to a different format. It’s the only format that has this problem.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's fair except it's not the only format that has this problem. There's JPEG 2000 and AVIF which have even less image editor support.

[–] Lantern 1 points 1 year ago

I had meant to say common format. I’ve never encountered a JPEG 2000.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I’m old enough to remember when the same argument was made for PNG files. It’s a stupid argument.

[–] Lantern 0 points 1 year ago

WEBP is 13 years old at this point and lacks the support that PNG had 3 years into its lifetime. The benefits are marginal, and without platform support it can’t catch on. Do your research before calling someone else’s argument stupid.