Programming

16780 readers

130 users here now

Welcome to the main community in programming.dev! Feel free to post anything relating to programming here!

Cross posting is strongly encouraged in the instance. If you feel your post or another person's post makes sense in another community cross post into it.

Hope you enjoy the instance!

Rules

Follow the programming.dev instance rules
Keep content related to programming in some way
If you're posting long videos try to add in some form of tldr for those who don't want to watch videos

Wormhole

Follow the wormhole through a path of communities [email protected]

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

What is this format specifier? (lemm.ee)

submitted 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

33 comments fedilink hide all child comments

What is %.2f? Why is it not just %f? Is there some additional calculation happening? The half function already does all the calculations including splitting the bill, so I'm not sure what %.2f is. (Btw why is this code not formatting correctly in lemmy?)


#include 
#include 

float half(float bill, float tax, int tip);

int main(void)
{
    float bill_amount = get_float("Bill before tax and tip: ");
    float tax_percent = get_float("Sale Tax Percent: ");
    int tip_percent = get_int("Tip percent: ");

    printf("You will owe $%.2f each!\n", half(bill_amount, tax_percent, tip_percent));
}

// TODO: Complete the function
float half(float bill, float tax, int tip)
{
    bill += (bill * (tax / 100.0));
    bill += (bill * (tip / 100.0));

    bill /= 2;

    return bill;
}

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 9 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (2 children)

This answer makes me so angry like revisiting trauma from learning programming.

If you bothered to read the documentation, which exists in abundance on the web, in many books, in the built-in manuals of various operating systems and dev tools, and which I also linked in my answer, you would see a full explanation with clear examples.

But you can't be bothered with any of that, and instead expect other people to spend their time writing custom tutorials just for you?

Your anger is misplaced. Please consider taking a walk.

I just remember asking questions early on and getting answers more confusing that are even harder to parse

When you ask people questions about their field of knowledge, and they don't know you, it's reasonable for their answers to assume you know the rudimentary basics. (Just as it would be reasonable for a fourth-year group to assume a that a stranger asking them questions has at least taken the first-year class.) Asking beyond your level of experience is not necessarily bad, but you should be ready to describe what you don't understand about the answer, so that people can either elaborate with a helpful level of detail or send you to a forum more appropriate for your needs. For example:

[email protected]

[–] abhibeckert -4 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

instead expect other people to spend their time writing custom tutorials just for you?

Nobody asked you to spend your time helping people out on Lemmy, if you don't want to do it, then don't do it. There's plenty of people here who are happy to do that.

And I don't think it is reasonable to expect people to understand the basics. If they did, then they wouldn't have asked.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 11 months ago

And I don’t think it is reasonable to expect people to understand the basics.

If we assumed everyone asking a question knows nothing at all of the surrounding topic, and responded at length addressing every related detail instead of what was asked, our answers would be tedious, and often annoying. It's called overexplaining (among other things). It's usually better to tailor the answer to the cues given by the person asking, and let them ask more questions if necessary.

If they did, then they wouldn’t have asked.

OP didn't ask about the basics. They clearly know them already, as we can see from the language and specificity of their question. I was happy to answer and provide a link for deeper detail.

But then someone else came along who apparently knew less than OP did, and decided express anger at me for not preemptively guessing and catering to their unstated special needs, in an answer that wasn't intended for them in the first place. That was incredibly entitled and rude.