this post was submitted on 16 Jun 2023
12 points (100.0% liked)
IPv6
317 readers
3 users here now
IPv6 Discussions
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I believe it was actually done in the way you say. There's NAT64 that ISP should implement that and there's RFC6052 with a reserved prefix for translation.
64:ff9b::/96
for the global internet and::ffff:0:0/96
for local stuff. I guess the problem is that ISPs aren't capable / don't have the interest in having NAT64 running.