Work Reform

10131 readers

934 users here now

A place to discuss positive changes that can make work more equitable, and to vent about current practices. We are NOT against work; we just want the fruits of our labor to be recognized better.

Our Philosophies:

All workers must be paid a living wage for their labor.
Income inequality is the main cause of lower living standards.
Workers must join together and fight back for what is rightfully theirs.
We must not be divided and conquered. Workers gain the most when they focus on unifying issues.

Our Goals

Higher wages for underpaid workers.
Better worker representation, including but not limited to unions.
Better and fewer working hours.
Stimulating a massive wave of worker organizing in the United States and beyond.
Organizing and supporting political causes and campaigns that put workers first.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

seeCseas

[email protected]

TinMod

Do you think potential candidates should be reimbursed in some form for taking assessments that are required by the employer in order to be considered for employment? (slippy.xyz)

submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/workreform

26 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Do you think potential candidates should be reimbursed in some form for taking assessments that are required by the employer in order to be considered for employment?

Also, should this be available for only job candidates who are not considered for the position?

Or should it go for every job candidate, even the ones that get the position?

Thanks for reading and being your most precious and sensual self ❤️.

@[email protected]
#workreform@lemmy.world

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] freewheel 6 points 1 year ago

Speaking as both a software developer and a sometime hiring manager or hiring consultant: Yes absolutely.

As a developer, if you give me something to " take home ", I expect to be paid an hourly rate for it. It doesn't really matter if the work is going to be used thereafter or if it's throw away. The employer gets valuable information, and I've spent time focused on their project to the exclusion of all else.

As a hiring manager or consultant, if I can't get a handle on your skill set sufficient to justify the risk of a 90-day trial relationship (pretty common in the state I live in, here in the United States) within a one hour conversation, then I've done something wrong. Interviews I've led or otherwise been a part of don't tend to last more than 15 or 20 minutes unless we really hit it off and start talking about 3d printing or something.

Note that everything I'm talking about refers to technical interviews. I don't do the HR stuff.