this post was submitted on 20 Sep 2023
-4 points (38.9% liked)
UAP - The Most Active Community Discussing UAP/UFOs
1226 readers
3 users here now
A community for civil discourse related to Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena. Share your sightings, experiences, news, and investigations. Everyone is welcome here, from believers to skeptics and everything in between.
New to Lemmy?
See the Getting Started Guide
Want Disclosure?
Declassify UAP offers a tool that automatically finds your representatives and sends them a prewritten message.
Community Spotlight
Featured Posts and User Investigations
Useful Links
- UAP Guide
- Disclosure Diaries
- UAP Timeline
- UFOs Wiki
- MUFON - Mutual UFO Network
- Investigate a Sighting
- Report a Sighting
Community Rules
- Follow the Code of Conduct.
- Posts must be on-topic.
- No duplicate posts.
- No commercial activity.
- No memes.
- Titles must accurately represent the content of the submission.
- Link posts must include a submission statement (comment on your own post).
- Common Question posts must include a link to the previous question thread if previously asked.
- Low effort, toxic comments regarding public figures may be removed.
- Off-topic political discussion may be removed at moderator discretion.
Other Communities
If you're interested in moderating or have any suggestions for the community, feel free to contact SignullGone or HM05_Me.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I realize there is a lot of controversy surrounding this particular topic. However, let's remain civil and not rush to conclusions. I understand that the individuals behind this alleged 'mummy' are sketchy, but if scientists and professionals are willing to do the research to prove or disprove the authenticity or origin of this 'mummy', let's just let them do their work and report their findings. I would like other places, such as Harvard and Oxford, to be able to conduct their own independent studies.
There is absolutely zero controversy among people who are mentally well.
I personally think there is nothing to this, however, if reputable researchers go through the data and come to the conclusion there is, I'm willing to change my stance. Are you?
Try being a bit more critical of the source. Some already questionable sources like the independent (a tabloid) say some scientists and doctors investigated, but who are there doctors and scientists? This needs to be a wholly transparent process, we can’t trust the word of a handful of nameless researchers. Something of this level of importance needs a significant number of researchers involved, because a handful of people are easy to corrupt. See the discovery of cold fusion debacle.
Already, researchers from the university that supposedly carbon dated the specimen are saying they never collected anything from the specimen, so who knows what they actually tested. Maussan refuses to explain where/how he came into possession of these “bodies”. What company did the DNA test, and has it been through secondary, tertiary independent testing? If you’re trusting a tabloid that tells you some random doctors and researchers have done things, utilize some critical thinking, don’t trust it. Be skeptical.
That is a fair criticism. I'm waiting for individuals not linked to Maussan to independently verify or dismiss his claims.
I want to clarify that by sharing this article, I am in no way putting my stamp of approval on it or saying I agree with the results. I don't. There's too much shadiness surrounding this whole thing, and I need more reputable individuals to get involved and investigate.
I shared the article for others to view and make up their own minds.
Yes, and if my grandmother had wheels she would be a bike.
Gino D'Acampo approves.