Linux
Welcome to c/linux!
Welcome to our thriving Linux community! Whether you're a seasoned Linux enthusiast or just starting your journey, we're excited to have you here. Explore, learn, and collaborate with like-minded individuals who share a passion for open-source software and the endless possibilities it offers. Together, let's dive into the world of Linux and embrace the power of freedom, customization, and innovation. Enjoy your stay and feel free to join the vibrant discussions that await you!
Rules:
-
Stay on topic: Posts and discussions should be related to Linux, open source software, and related technologies.
-
Be respectful: Treat fellow community members with respect and courtesy.
-
Quality over quantity: Share informative and thought-provoking content.
-
No spam or self-promotion: Avoid excessive self-promotion or spamming.
-
No NSFW adult content
-
Follow general lemmy guidelines.
view the rest of the comments
You can't fix a broken design and also maintain backwards compatibility.
Wayland creates and implements a new design, so yes things will need to be changed to work with it
lol, I don't get why people keep using this argument...
All of these developers, companies, toolkits, DEs and various other projects have decided that it's easier to literally rewrite the entire Linux desktop than to continue hacking Xorg.
In fact they don't want to touch Xorg so much that they're willing to spend 14 years (and counting) replacing it.
And you see this as indication that Wayland is trash?
Go right ahead. Start by adding per monitor refresh rate.
I take from that that you are ready to volunteer to do this?
Oh, I get it.
You agree that there are issues about it, you demand that people fox them for you, but if you don't like the solution, you go on rants on social media for people to implement your solution despite everyone working on the problem telling you it's a bad idea.
Hmm, entitled much?