this post was submitted on 19 Sep 2023
1568 points (98.5% liked)

Memes

45895 readers
1559 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago (5 children)

i fear mozilla may be in the line here, finally giving-in to google on manifest 3's limitations, web 'drm', and targeted ads program, in exchange for keeping the lights on (google is their single biggest source of funding via payment for being default search).

[–] ArbiterXero 25 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I actually don’t think so.

See it looks like Mozilla needs Google, but it’s actually the opposite.

Google needs Mozilla more than Mozilla needs Google.

Google is in a huge antitrust suit over chrome and web searches. They’re in trouble.

They need to be able to show that there’s a valid competitor, and Mozilla is the only REAL competitor, all the rest are little more than skins on chrome.

Look up Microsoft in their antitrust suit. They invested heavily in Apple, literally saving Apple from bankruptcy just so that they weren’t the only show in town because having eliminated all your competitors makes the antitrust suit a slam fucking dunk.

Have hope my young padawan, there is still some moves left to be played.

[–] madcaesar 2 points 1 year ago

This is good.. But also we're fucked if it's come to this... God damn...

[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I see literally no incentive for them to limit their API to just the Google version of Manifest v3. If I recall correctly they already expanded their implementation to offer more.

If they ever implement WEI (the "web DRM") then it's because the Internet forces their hand. A web browser is only as useful as the websites it can browse. If our banks will demand WEI support Mozilla doesn't have much choice. We need to worry about the website providers changing the web, not Mozilla adjusting Firefox to these changes. In the latter case it's already too late and it's hard to blame Mozilla at this point.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago

I agree on WEI, and that's the scary part since crappy companies will demand it in the name of security and everyone gets fucked and the Internet becomes a little less free.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

People wouldn’t use Firefox if it couldn’t run google and if it made bing default then you’d see a bunch of idiots making memes about how it’s so bad and they won’t use it because it’s default

Google has been worse than bing for a decade and chrome has been worse than Firefox for longer. But people still use them and think they are the best.

You even have people make jokes about edge only existing to download chrome

I feel like you vastly overestimate the audience

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

For my searches, Google still works better than bing. I wonder for what topics bing gives better results?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Sports, piracy, video games, videos, and tech support for me

Google’s advantage for me is the date filter. If I want to find something from a decade ago then I have to use it

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

That would be a tragedy

[–] [email protected] -3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I'm honestly astonished that Google hasn't pulled the plug on Mozilla yet. After all, their missions completely and utterly oppose each other and Mozilla probably causes the biggest losses to Google.

If your prediction comes true, which isn't unlikely, Firefox forks that already exist would probably take its spot. Or privacy friendly Chromium based browsers. I know, the latter sounds like an oxymoron, but they exist and one of them I would be hated on for naming has actually been proven to have better out of the box privacy than Firefox.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The problem with privacy-friendly Chromium is that no one is building a mobile counterpart.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Mozilla's mobile version of Firefox supports desktop extensions. It's not inherently privacy friendly but you can make it that way.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Yeah but chromium..

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

But if Mozilla goes, Google are setting themselves up for a hell of a lawsuit, since the only cross-device browser would be Chrome (and it's children)