this post was submitted on 18 Sep 2023
200 points (85.7% liked)

Fuck Cars

9808 readers
40 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

~~You don't need the Internet, only gps.~~ You can also design a system that only connects to the gps and internet network if you want to go over 20mph. That way the gps only tracks you on the highways or between cities.

But in general, driving a car is not a good option if you don't want to be tracked, because you need to display an identifying number at all times. It's common for police to use automatic license plate readers, and who knows how that data is stored.

The acoustic bicycle has been for a long time, and probably will be forever, the preferred vehicle for trouble making revolutionary types

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I have a bicycle and use it more than my car but I still need a car and I don't want my car to also be a computer. There is no way a feature explicitly restricting your behavior is going to be designed in a way that respects your privacy, most new cars already store all data and phone home unaccountably, and they're obviously going to want to remotely upgrade where/what speeds are allowed in real time. Yeah there's license plate trackers and those suck too but they aren't always present everywhere or recording fine grain data to the same extent.

Until the people controlling the software can be trusted or the software/hardware is made entirely transparent IMO computers in cars beyond abs/transmission is bad and should be resisted.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They’re obviously going to want to remotely upgrade where/what speeds are allowed in real time

Thats a good point. I guess it would be a sacrifice to need to do an update every time the map changes. And probably cities will want to expand their slow zone and not want cars to speed. So an internet connection is probably necessary, at least to update the maps each time you turn on the car.

There is no way a feature explicitly restricting your behavior is going to be designed in a way that respects your privacy

I don't see why this would be the case. Either way, you can think of this feature as a smart override to a dumb speed governor. Therefore, the software exists to expand your behavior.

I don’t want my car to also be a computer

That is a big ask. Particularly given the fact that the market inexplicably wants their cars to be a computer. It seems to be the case that people who want their privacy respected need to sacrifice some conveniences. So you probably will either have to struggle to maintain an old car, do a lot of modifications to a new car, or not drive a car at all, if you want your privacy respected in the near future, regardless of whether speed governors become mandated.

Given that this is c/FuckCars, i'd recommend not driving a car at all. Perhaps a DIY ebike is a good car replacement.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I don’t see why this would be the case.

You acknowledge that an internet connection would be needed. There's no chance these companies willingly make their software open source and if they did it wouldn't help with the user adversarial goal of speed limiting so that's an extra reason not to. So you've got an unaccountable black box with free reign to connect to company servers from your car, how do you expect that to go?

i’d recommend not driving a car at all

Yes, great, I'd love to, please give me the public transportation infrastructure I would need to make that happen. In the meantime let's do the speed limiting low tech and outside of my car with bollards or whatever instead of making the experience of needing to drive even more hellish and dystopian.

[–] grue 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You don’t need the Internet, only gps.

Even if you try to simplify the system to "20 mph limit in the city, and no speed limit outside the city," you still need an internet connection to tell you where the city limits are. This is especially true since they can change due to annexations.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Youre right. I edited the comment