Rust

6128 readers

59 users here now

Welcome to the Rust community! This is a place to discuss about the Rust programming language.

Wormhole

[email protected]

Credits

The icon is a modified version of the official rust logo (changing the colors to a gradient and black background)

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

When to Use Arc Instead of Vec (youtu.be)

submitted 2 years ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

10 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Rust lets you do efficient reference-counted strings and dynamic arrays using Arc basically just as easily as their owning (and deep-cloning) equivalents, String and Vec respectively. So why not use them as a reasonable default, until you actually need the mutability that String and Vec provide? Get into the weeds with me here, feat. some cool visualizations, with special guest appearance from Box.

This video assumes some familiarity with Rust and its core smart pointer types, namely Vec/String/Rc/Arc/Box, along with data structures like HashMap and BTreeMap, and traits like Clone, Hash, Ord, and serde::{Serialize, Deserialize}.

serde feature flag for Rc/Arc
Arc docs
Vec docs
Smart pointers in Rust • Crust of Rust
animations

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] MetricExpansion 1 points 2 years ago

Passing around references works, but then you have to deal with ownership issues. Often the motivation for cloning a Vec or String is just to avoid dealing with lifetimes and to get ownership, but the mutability isn’t actually required. In these situations I think the video’s recommendation to use an Arc is actually a good one.