Nebula

You're right on this one.

It's so tiring for people to keep repeating this annoying "fac"t that the US is big hence all the poor zoning. It's irrelevant. It's a cop out.

Most food deserts are found in urban areas, where most people live.

The size of the US is very important when discussing food deserts, including within urban limits. Many cities are not friendly to pedestrians and are set up so you have to drive to the commercial centers to get food. When you couple that with poor public transportation, it doesn't make it easy to get fresh food. Mixed use areas are also not as common, since residential and commercial zoning keeps stores out of residential areas.

Like, I have something like 8 grocery stores within 10 miles of me, but there's almost no sidewalks in either direction, and in one direction, you're walking on highway to get there, which isn't safe.

Also, a four hour roundtrip to a grocery store isn't really feasible when you also have work, kids, chores, etc.

Looking at the London metro area, Google tells me that it's about 600 square miles with a population of 9 million. For comparison, Detroit Metro area is almost 1.2K square miles with a population of 3.7 million. Houston is 10K square miles with a population of 7.1 million

So yeah, the size of the US is definitely a factor in food deserts. Outside of maybe NYC metro area (4.6k square miles with 20.1 million people), we just don't have the population density in most of our urban areas.

the vast majority of people still live within metro areas

But when we talk about food deserts, that's not where we're talking about. We're not talking about the vast majority. We're talking about the other 20%, or 66 million Americans, who live in rural areas and who get a Dollar General instead of an Wegman's.

"Despite the increase in the urban population, urban areas, defined as densely developed residential, commercial, and other nonresidential areas, now account for 80.0% of the U.S. population" - https://www.census.gov/newsroom/press-releases/2022/urban-rural-populations.html

These Dollar General arguments never leave any doubt as to who lives in a city and who lives in the boonies.

Yeah that’s a fair point and I understand this is the case in more rural areas, but what about Atlanta like discussed in the video? There you would have loads of people living in a certain area and although they might not have a lot of money, wouldn’t their desire to buy the foods and products of where they’re from be a lifeline for these small shops?

Atlantan here. Best I can do is this.

That's one of many ethnic shopping centers along the stroad called Buford Highway, which is the corridor along which many of the metro area's Latino and Asian folks live.

I don’t understand why the economics for those shops would be different in the US and why you wouldn’t have them in less economically developed areas in cities such as Atlanta. Perhaps because dollar stores don’t really exist here, but here they need to compete with bigger supermarket chains that do operate in all parts of the city.

There's a Family Dollar and a Dollar Tree within a mile of this location.

I'm in suburban Minneapolis, Minnesota and have at least four different small grocers within 500m. At 2km, I have at least four supermarkets and dozens of smaller options. Minnesota is also weird in how much fresh produce gas stations have because no one wants to make two stops in winter. Overall, Dollar General is actually pretty uncompetitive comparatively.

Atlanta is an outlier because of low population density. Additionally, the poor in Atlanta are brutally poor. Income disparity is pretty crazy. $5.15 is the state minimum wage.

The other thing about the US is the missing middle. We don't have a lot of medium density housing. There is a focus on single family homes because the car industry was so successful at convincing everyone and politicians that everyone needed a car. Ironically, now we all need cars because everything is spread out. Even big cities like Atlanta, Denver, Detroit, etc... have a ton of urban sprawl and low density. Our cities just aren't nearly as walkable and sense as others.

I think a lot of it comes down to when you're struggling as many people are, what happens a few years down the line doesn't matter as much as do I have enough to get by today. And then if you manage to make it through today, you have to worry about tomorrow because that's gonna become today real soon.

Fresh vegetables and fruits can be a fantasy when you're trying to feed a family on a single income and have to figure out how to do it for five dollars.

I was lucky growing up, we were lower middle class but lived in the country and my dad had a huge vegetable garden and if it was winter we could afford fresh vegetables (I also really love veggies so even canned tastes good to me).

But my girlfriend grew up and her mom struggled with three daughters and her dad was useless. My girlfriend was convinced she didn't like vegetables except sweet corn because as sad as it is she didn't get a chance to try any that were cooked correctly and didn't come out of a can. Guess who loves Brussels sprouts now?

They might desire it, but it may not be enough to convince grocery stores to open up there.

The is another video that Wendover did about grocery stores in general and most of the country has consolidated to a few major chains with massive supply chains backing them up. It is really hard to compete with them on price.

Some major cities have bodegas which fill this role, but relations between bodegas and the communities they serve can be strained as bodegas charge higher prices for lower quality produce, in part because they don't have access to the grocery store supply chains.