this post was submitted on 15 Sep 2023
97 points (92.2% liked)

Technology

60370 readers
7711 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Doesn't say, but if the electricity used is from renewables then it's irrelevant, as it can potentially produce graphene at 5% of the current price

Found this re co2

Compared to commercial methods for carbon nanotube production that are being used right now, ours uses about 90% less energy and generates 90%-94% less carbon dioxide," Wyss said.

https://phys.org/news/2023-02-joule-technique-efficiently-would-be-pollution.html

If they're making graphene and hydrogen then there can't be much left over can there?