this post was submitted on 14 Sep 2023
339 points (98.8% liked)

Technology

60073 readers
3765 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
L3s
[email protected]
[email protected]
L4s
enu
339
Chrome, Firefox and other browsers affected by critical WebP vulnerability (siliconangle.com)
submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/technology
45 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] abhibeckert 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

AVIF only beats WebP for heavily compressed images and it doesn't beat it by much.

If you want high quality images - then WebP is way better than AVIF. And if you want a lossless image then AVIF is totally useless. Lossless AVIF files are often 2x or 3x larger than an uncompressed image. WTF.

Lossless WebP images can be as good as a quarter the size of an uncompressed source.

And as bandwidth improves and images don't really get much bigger (we're already at the limit of human visual perception for reasonable file sizes) for me that makes WebP a better compression algorithm than AVIF.