this post was submitted on 10 Sep 2023
1020 points (97.8% liked)

Comics

5826 readers
66 users here now

This is a community for everything comics related! A place for all comics fans.

Rules:

1- Do not violate lemmy.ml site-wide rules

2- Be civil.

3- If you are going to post NSFW content that doesn't violate the lemmy.ml site-wide rules, please mark it as NSFW and add a content warning (CW). This includes content that shows the killing of people and or animals, gore, content that talks about suicide or shows suicide, content that talks about sexual assault, etc. Please use your best judgement. We want to keep this space safe for all our comic lovers.

4- No Zionism or Hasbara apologia of any kind. We stand with Palestine πŸ‡΅πŸ‡Έ . Zionists will be banned on sight.

5- The moderation team reserves the right to remove any post or comments that it deems a necessary for the well-being and safety of the members of this community, and same goes with temporarily or permanently banning any user.

Guidelines:

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
1020
Just like that. (lemmy.world)
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by ekZepp to c/[email protected]
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Seudo 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If it doesn't work then it's not carbon offseting...

Seems like some people (I might be the misinformed one) are referring to specific policies, not the broader concept. Plant a tree and we can be fairly certain it will take carbon out of the atmosphere because that's what the majority of a tree is made of. Pretty basic stuff.

If politicians are trying to rought the masses with shitty policies then criticise that, not the very idea that there's more we could be doing about manmade climate change.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Only a handful of countries have carbon offset policies. It's mostly corporations "volunteering" for a carbon offset program as part of a greenwashing campaign. The whole thing can work in theory, but a lot of these programs are way too cheap for the current state of carbon capture technology.

That's if they're even bothering to implement a real solution at all. They may be planting trees only to pull them up again in a year and start fresh, but count 30 years of expected carbon capture for both sets. Trees aren't even the best carbon sink to begin with, but people like trees. That, in turn, makes them all the better for greenwashing. Cheap, get to count the same grove multiple times, and looks good for marketing. Tanks of algae are ugly, but they would work far better at this job.

All this said, I think threads like this give people the mistaken impression that carbon capture is entirely a scam. We will almost certainly need actual carbon capture to avoid +2C of warming.