this post was submitted on 09 Sep 2023
102 points (100.0% liked)
Ukraine
8433 readers
665 users here now
News and discussion related to Ukraine
🇺🇦 Sympathy for enemy combatants is prohibited.
🌻🤢No content depicting extreme violence or gore.
💥Posts containing combat footage should include [Combat] in title
🚷Combat videos containing any footage of a visible human involved must be flagged NSFW
❗ Server Rules
- Remember the human! (no harassment, threats, etc.)
- No racism or other discrimination
- No Nazis, QAnon or similar
- No porn
- No ads or spam (includes charities)
- No content against Finnish law
💳💥 Donate to support Ukraine's Defense
💳⚕️⛑️ Donate to support Humanitarian Aid
🪖 🫡 Volunteer with the International Legionnaires
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Both.
They need to determine if the fragments are from an actual drone that flew across the border. For all they know it’s fragments of multiple drones collected from multiple other locations and planted there.
Once they’re satisfied that it was flown and crashed, as opposed to planted, then they need to verify if it was Russian. More importantly they’ll want to confirm it was flown in by Russia and wasn’t somehow obtained by another country that wants to frame Russia in an attempt to draw Romania into the conflict.
The chances of entering a war over a single drone are very slim. People scream "article 5" like it's some inevitable all out military action.
In reality it means proportional reaction which can be as simple as stationing more air defense systems on the border to detect and shut down any further attempts.
So the attribution to russia is one part of the investigation, another is determining the intention and best course of action.