this post was submitted on 07 Sep 2023
14 points (93.8% liked)
PCGaming
6549 readers
877 users here now
Rule 0: Be civil
Rule #1: No spam, porn, or facilitating piracy
Rule #2: No advertisements
Rule #3: No memes, PCMR language, or low-effort posts/comments
Rule #4: No tech support or game help questions
Rule #5: No questions about building/buying computers, hardware, peripherals, furniture, etc.
Rule #6: No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
Rule #7: No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts
Rule #8: No off-topic posts/comments
Rule #9: Use the original source, no editorialized titles, no duplicates
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Every time AMD seems like it can hit its stride next generation (looking at last gen) they somehow make some weird, unexpected decision that kneecaps their next one (this gen).
The fact this barely keeps up with last gen is honestly disappointing. The only real upgrades this gen are at the high end of the stack which is prohibitively expensive. I guess I'll be sticking to my 3060ti for at least another gen.
The industry seems to be rhyming with the old 3dfx days where the low and mid tier were completely ignored and gamers were being squeezed for money with only high end really being available same worth anything.
Absolutely! And because this is Gen 1 of AMD's chip let design architecture, whatever isn't the high end is more of a last gen equivalent (as in near identical performance) over even an incremental upgrade.
I wonder how much longer this can go on for.