Technology

60058 readers

2926 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

596

US broadband grant rules shut out small ISPs and municipalities, advocates say (arstechnica.com)

submitted 1 year ago by DannyMac to c/technology

63 comments fedilink hide all child comments

The biggest Internet service providers will dominate a $42.45 billion broadband grant program unless the Biden administration changes a rule requiring grant recipients to obtain a letter of credit from a bank, according to a joint statement from consumer advocacy groups, local government officials, and advocates for small ISPs.

The letter sent today to US government officials argues that "by establishing capital barriers too steep for all but the best-funded ISPs, the LOC [letter-of-credit requirement] shuts out the vast majority of entities the program claims to prioritize: small and community-centered ISPs, minority and women-owned ISPs, nonprofits, and municipalities."

The rule is part of the Broadband Equity Access and Deployment (BEAD) program that's being administered by the National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA).

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Isn't this like the third round of fiber money? If I remember correctly, the only company that didn't just pocket basically all of the money was Verizon which rolled out some fiber, no where near the commitment though.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm pretty sure this is the third.

They constantly pocket it, in addition to their profits, and refuse to expand their networks because it's expensive to dig holes and lay down wire.

Not sure how we did it before. Not sure how we built roads, or telecommunications, or railroads. Maybe our ancestors were magical or something.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

When unions had more power, things actually got done. Unions used to be much more involved in the planning of activities and work direction. That has been eroded, most of our laws and protections have.

Laws and protections that basically hark back to the days after unionization, which wars were fought for.

People take for granted all of the laws and protections that are even still in place, let alone those removed because "there no longer needed and get in the way of growth", or whatever excuse, forgetting we had to basically fight a civil war just to get weekends and a standard 8 hour work day. We were even getting close to unions talking about owning the means of production (socialism) but that obviously never came to fruition as the government/Capitalists quickly realized placating the unions with their wish list would be far better for them in the long run then them getting any funny ideas about actual wealth ownership for the common man or good.