this post was submitted on 17 Jun 2023
2 points (100.0% liked)
Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.
5189 readers
531 users here now
Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.
As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades:
How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world:
Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:
Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Yes BECCS is a thing on paper. There's even one contract that Microsoft has signed for a small amount of it. It's going to be limited in scale though: the quantity of biofuels that can be sustainably produced is limited.
You need to get fossil fuel use to near zero for these to do what we need.
DAC and BECCS are just two of many options. A lot of CDR choices will be based on location - what resources are available for moving CO2 from air to concentrated forms, and what means are available for keeping it in that form a long time. Silicate rock, crushed to dust, can "weather" to carbonate minerals relatively fast. There are a whole range of biomass conversion options - depending on what ecosystems are in a place, or can be established with local benefit. And for sequestering, there are also various ways to go.
And absolutely all of the CDR in the world will be wasted if we keep burning fossil fuels. But there are some fossil fuel uses that will be very difficult to eliminate, and there is all that legacy CO2 already in circulation - we have to do both; we have to achieve negative CO2.