this post was submitted on 04 Sep 2023
1035 points (97.9% liked)
Curated Tumblr
3984 readers
656 users here now
For preserving the least toxic and most culturally relevant Tumblr heritage posts.
Image descriptions and plain text captions of written content are expected of all screenshots. Here are some image text extractors (I looked these up quick and will gladly take FOSS recommendations):
-web
-iOS
Please begin copied raw text posts (lacking a screenshot that makes it apparent it is from Tumblr) with:
# This has been reposted here to Lemmy as part of the "Curated Tumblr Project."
I made the icon using multiple creative commons svg resources, the banner is this.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Ahh yes, the downside of using Jerboa. Sometimes it doesn't like certain images and doesn't let them view you. Even worse: tried opening the post in my web browser and it refused to show as well!
The things I do for not being on r€ddit anymore...
Edit: Copied thumbnail link and it works. I'm an absolute dipshit.
that's interesting to know - I only really use Lemmy on desktop and it allowed me to upload the image to... where ever lemmy is hosting these images I guess?
Hmmm
Working link https://sh.itjust.works/pictrs/image/c51a1850-9926-43e3-9045-ef419896fc5b.webp
Not working link (Not Jerboas fault, doesn't work in browser either) https://lemmy.today/pictrs/image/be1cd2d2-439b-4188-ae13-c812c7875846.png
Each post uploaded (with url)has two urls: thumbnail_url and url.
https://mv-gh.github.io/lemmy_openapi_spec/#tag/Post/paths/~1post/get
Jerboa shows the thumbnail_url on home (in small_card postviewmode) and actual url in the post. If you swap modes you see it show the image
Now as far as I know Lemmy automatically makes the thumbnail URL.
I don't have time rn to dive into the specifics
But i do find it very weird thumbnail_url and url are on different instances. Possible related to this
https://github.com/LemmyNet/lemmy/issues/3870 ??
I'll look into it later more but it's seems more like a backend issue instead of the client